The Impact of Generative AI on Distance Learning Integrity

Understanding Distance Learning Evolution

Distance learning has a history that predates the digital era. Initially, when educators and learners were separated by distance, they relied on books and, later, radio broadcasts for educational purposes.

In the current digital landscape, numerous options exist for remote study. Asynchronous online courses allow students to engage with course materials at their convenience, using computers or mobile devices, and to complete assignments at their own pace. This flexibility enhances learning opportunities regardless of time or location.

Concerns Over Course Quality and AI's Role

Despite the advantages, some experts express concerns regarding the effectiveness of these courses and the outcomes for students. The introduction of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has intensified these concerns.

GenAI poses a significant threat to academic integrity across various learning formats, including both live online and traditional classroom settings. The most considerable risk is associated with asynchronous courses, where students can utilize AI tools without oversight, making it challenging for educators to determine if students are genuinely working independently.

Challenges in Asynchronous Learning Models

Compromised Learning Models

Asynchronous courses have traditionally depended on methods like discussion forums, essays, and pre-recorded lectures. However, these approaches are increasingly ineffective as distinguishing between AI-generated and human-created content becomes more challenging.

The risk is particularly pronounced in student discussions and posts, where GenAI can swiftly and accurately produce responses and opinions. Educators may invest significant time crafting their responses, yet remain unaware of whether the content originated from students or AI.

Modern AI tools, such as ChatGPT's Atlas Browser, can access course materials, comprehend content, and complete assignments with minimal student involvement.

Addressing Academic Integrity

While requiring accurate citations in written assignments may seem like a safeguard, AI can easily fulfill this requirement, rendering it a false sense of security that fails to tackle the core issue: AI complicates honest academic work.

Students might be instructed to submit drafts, version histories, and checkpoints to illustrate their work processes. However, these can also be easily manipulated or fabricated, leaving educators overwhelmed with monitoring tasks instead of focusing on genuine student learning.

Additionally, differentiating between AI-generated infographics and videos and those created by humans has become increasingly difficult.