Delhi High Court Orders Review of Attendance Rules for Law Students

Significant Ruling by Delhi High Court

BCI: On Monday, the Delhi High Court made a pivotal decision impacting law students. The court instructed the Bar Council of India to reassess and modify the compulsory attendance regulations for both three-year and five-year LLB programs. The ruling emphasized that students should not be prevented from taking exams due to insufficient attendance.

Background of the Case

A bench comprising Justices Prabha M. Singh and Amit Sharma delivered this verdict in connection with a case involving a student's tragic suicide in 2016, who was denied the opportunity to sit for exams because of low attendance.

Broader Perspective on Legal Education

Legal education transcends classroom boundaries.
The High Court articulated that legal education should not be confined to rote memorization or traditional classroom settings. It encompasses the comprehension, application, and effective utilization of the law. The court further noted that mere physical attendance does not equate to a comprehensive educational experience, as it stifles students' creative expression.

Inclusion of Extracurricular Activities

Recognition for Student Engagement
The High Court urged the Bar Council of India to revise its guidelines to acknowledge student involvement as part of their academic pursuits. The court suggested that students should receive credit for engaging in activities such as moot courts, seminars, mock trials, debates, and visits to courts. These amendments should align with the New Education Policy 2020 and the UGC Regulations 2023.