JNU Administration Takes Action Amid Protests Over Facial Recognition System
Strict Measures Implemented Following Protests
The administration at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) has responded decisively to the unrest triggered by protests against the newly proposed facial recognition system. A research scholar has been suspended for a semester, and three student leaders, including the president of the student union, have faced financial penalties.
This issue gained traction in August 2025 when students voiced their opposition to the facial recognition technology being implemented at the university's central library. The students argued that investing substantial funds in such technology was unwarranted, especially given the university's lack of essential facilities, including journal subscriptions and adequate seating in the library.
Details of the Incident
The installation of facial recognition access gates at JNU's Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Central Library sparked significant protests. Students expressed their dissatisfaction, leading to confrontations that resulted in injuries to student leaders Nitish Kumar and Manikant Patel.
Consequences for Student Leaders
On October 28, the Chief Proctor of JNU announced disciplinary actions. Manikant Patel, a PhD candidate, was expelled for one semester and banned from campus, incurring a fine of ₹15,000 for his involvement in the protests, which included alleged assaults on security personnel and disruptive behavior.
In addition, JNUSU President Nitish Kumar was fined ₹19,000 and warned against future misconduct, while Vice President Manisha received a ₹5,000 fine and a similar warning.
Student Reactions and Administration's Defense
In the aftermath of these actions, Manikant Patel criticized the administration for misrepresenting the events. He stated, "Our demands were simply for basic amenities. Instead of addressing our concerns, the administration chose to invest heavily in a facial recognition system. I sustained an injury during the protests, yet the official report claims that security guards were harmed."
Administration's Justification
The JNU administration defended its actions, asserting that Patel's conduct showed a blatant disregard for institutional protocols. However, they opted for a lenient punishment of one semester to consider his future prospects.