NTA Clarifies CUET PG 2026 Exam Procedures and Scoring

The National Testing Agency (NTA) has issued a clarification regarding the CUET PG 2026 examination, addressing concerns about the scheduling of exams and the absence of score normalization. The NTA confirmed that all candidates were evaluated based on their actual marks, with no special concessions for those who participated in the re-examination. The agency emphasized the consistency in difficulty levels across both the main exam and the re-examination, ensuring a fair assessment process. This article delves into the details of the NTA's policies and the implications for candidates.

By Ambika Singh Jun 15, 2026, 10:08 IST

NTA's Clarification on CUET PG 2026 Examination

The National Testing Agency (NTA) has addressed concerns raised on social media regarding the scheduling of certain CUET PG 2026 subject exams on different dates and the lack of score normalization. The NTA confirmed that no normalization process was utilized for the CUET PG examination, ensuring all candidates were assessed based on their actual marks.

The NTA reported that 565 candidates across 28 subjects were unable to sit for their exams in March 2026 due to law-and-order issues in Tura (Meghalaya) and security concerns at some overseas centers. These circumstances were beyond the candidates' control. To mitigate any disadvantages, the NTA arranged a re-examination for these candidates on March 29 and 30, 2026, prioritizing their interests.

**No Special Considerations for Re-examination Candidates**

The NTA maintains that the CUET PG examination reports the absolute marks achieved by each candidate in every subject. There is no normalization of scores for any candidate, whether in the main examination or the re-examination. Thus, candidates who participated in the re-examination received no special considerations and were evaluated solely on their obtained marks.

Moreover, normalizing scores between these two groups lacks statistical relevance due to the significant difference in candidate numbers. For example, around 16,000 candidates took the English subject in the main examination, while only about 120 participated in the re-examination. In Political Science, approximately 26,000 candidates appeared for the main exam, compared to about 100 in the re-examination. Similarly, in History, around 13,600 candidates sat for the main exam, while fewer than 80 took the re-examination. The NTA emphasized that a group of 100 candidates cannot be statistically normalized against a larger pool of thousands.

**Consistent Difficulty Levels in Exams**

The re-examination utilized question papers that had been finalized by subject experts, who confirmed that the difficulty level was consistent with that of the main examination papers for the respective subjects. The NTA stated that the scoring for every CUET PG candidate was calculated uniformly, based on the absolute marks obtained. The rescheduling of the exam did not change the scoring methodology. The NTA is dedicated to conducting its examinations in a fair, transparent, and candidate-focused manner.